Wednesday 1 February 2012

Cameron urge to India reconsider its jet decision


David Cameron has vowed to “encourage” India to reconsider its decision to buy France’s Dassault jet fighter instead of Eurofighter’s Typhoon, in which BAE Systems, the UK defence contractor, has a large stake.

The Eurofighter’s loss to France raises questions about the UK’s relationship with India as well as the prime minister’s clout in New Delhi. The coalition government has put much focus on strengthening the UK’s ties with Asia’s third largest economy, illustrated by Mr Cameron’s high-profile trade visit to India last year.

High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights.

Mr Cameron said India’s decision to award Dassault’s Rafale jet preferred bidder status in the $20bn contract for 126 jets was disappointing, but added that Typhoon still had a chance to win the order – one of the biggest ever for defence industry – because the the final contract had not yet been.

“I will do everything I can – as I have already – to encourage the Indians to look at Typhoon, because I think it is such a good aircraft,’’ he told MPs on Wednesday.

In Germany where Angela Merkel, chancellor, had also pushed hard for Typhoon, a spokesman said Berlin regretted Eurofighter’s offer had not been accepted “for the moment”. But he added that past bidding for such contracts showed that being granted exclusive talks did not always lead to a sale, and that other bidders could still have a chance.

The news that Typhoon, the clear frontrunner, had failed to win one of the key export deals for the industry comes at an awkward time for Mr Cameron’s government, which has been far more engaged in helping UK defence companies sell their equipment, weapons and support services abroad than that of Gordon Brown, his predecessor.

On Wednesday the Ministry of Defence published a white paper in which it pledged further to support defence industry exports, against a background of deep cuts to the national defence budget.

But Mr Cameron came under fire from his own MPs on Wednesday for not doing more to secure the deal for Eurofighter. David Davis, a member of Mr Cameron’s shadow cabinet while in opposition, asked why the UK gave so much aid to India but had not won this crucial contract. He asked the prime minister to “engage himself and the full force of the government to change this decision”.

Like London and Berlin, the four companies in the Eurofighter consortium, including the Franco-German EADS , Britain’s BAE Systems and Italy’s Finmeccanica, also have promised to fight on.

BAE said in a statement: “We will continue to support the Indian customer and its evaluation process and work with our European partner companies and their respective governments to seek to understand the basis of the announcement.”

Endre Lunde of IHS Jane’s, the consultant, said French political backing had been essential in strengthening the French bid, and that the Rafale win was therefore “a major victory for President Nicolas Sarkozy . . . and a major loss for the UK”.

Today SC going to decide on probing P Chidambaram's role in 2G scam

New Delhi: The Supreme Court is set to give its judgment on Thursday on the plea seeking probe into the role of Union Home Minister P Chidambaram in the 2G spectrum scam.
The apex court is also slated to give a judgment on whether the 2G licences should be cancelled.
It will further decide if a Special Investigation Team (SIT) should oversee the investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
SC to decide on probing P Chidambaram
The judgements will be pronounced by a bench comprising justices G S Singhvi and A K Ganguly on the plea for probe against Chidambaram and for cancellation of licences of spectrum on October 10 and March 17 respectively in 2011.
The petitions on the issues were filed by NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) and Janata Party chief Subramanian Swamy.
The role of Chidambaram in the 2G scam was raised in the Supreme Court by the petitioners who had pointed out that there was evidence on record showing that the decision regarding pricing of spectrum was taken jointly by him and Raja.
A Finance Ministry note to the PMO signed by Pranab Mukherjee was also taken on record by the apex court in which it was stated that the scam could have been averted had Chidambram suggested the policy of auction instead of first-come-first-served policy on allocation of spectrum.
The Centre and CBI had vehemently opposed any probe against Chidambram who was the Finance Minister at the time of allotment of spectrum in 2008.
They had maintained that Chidambaram was not in direct communication with the then Telecom Minister A Raja in determining the price of the radio waves.
However, Swamy and the Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) had refuted the claims of CBI and the Centre that Chidambaram was not in the picture till January, 10, 2008, when the Department of Telecommunication (DoT) headed by Raja issued 122 Letters of Intent (LoIs) to telecom companies without following the policy of auction.
Swamy and CPIL's counsel Prashant Bhushan had contended Chidambaram was "consistently" informed of what was going on and "till November 30, 2007, Chidambaram was apprised of what Raja was up to".
(With Additional Inputs from PTI)